Photo: John Locher, AP/AP
UFC 175 was a decent night of fights. Nothing amazing, but the main event made it worthwhile. The all too familiar hobgoblin of mixed-martial arts judging reared its ugly head when two of the judges gave Russell Doane the nod over Marcus Brimage. Uriah Hall showed exceptional fortitude in being able to fight two-and-a-half rounds with a gruesomely broken toe. The bout between Stefan Struve and Matt Mitrione was sadly cancelled during the pay-per-view broadcast. The two noteworthy events were the two championship bouts, and I shall focus on them here.
Ronda Rousey versus Alexis Davis: Moving onto the short-lived co-main event, it only took Ronda Rousey sixteen seconds to batter Alexis Davis into submission. Rousey’s performance showed that often what separates an alright attack into a sublime one is how the fighter is able to concatenate together a combination of different techniques. Besides the judo throw, at no point was I amazed by each of her techniques understood by themselves, what amazed me was the fluidity with which Rousey combined them all together. A right counter to a knee to the midsection to a judo throw bringing the fight to the ground, where she captured Davis’ head and left arm, where Rousey finished the fight.
It’s a shame that Rousey is such a dominant fighter in such a weak division because I can’t say that I’m looking forward to her next bout. Plus, fighters like McMann, who fought and loss to Rousey at UFC 170 probably need more time to face competition and to get better at the game before being a title shot. That McMann was given a title fight after only one appearance in the UFC’s women’s bantamweight division is horrible evidence for the soundness of the contenders there. And then feeding a fighter like McMann, still relatively new to the big show, to the utterly dominant champion doesn’t serve to make that division any stronger. In fact, it only makes it weaker. Big upsets like Renan Barão versus TJ Dillashaw do happen, but match making shouldn’t happen with the hope of a big upset; instead, match making should be made with reasonable expectations for the contender’s possible performance.
Right now, in the women’s bantamweight division, there simply aren’t any contenders who have a reasonable expectation for defeating Ronda Rousey. We can talk all we want about how Cat Zingano is next in line and how she therefore deserves the next shot, but does she actually have a reasonable chance of even giving Rousey some stirring competition? I doubt it, and that’s why I won’t be looking forwards to that bout.
I don’t tune in to watch crushing defeats and lasting domination, I tune in to watch competitive fights, and hopefully learn a thing or two in the process. When there is a crushing defeat, it’s really only fulfilling if one of the fighters is able to find a chink in his opponent’s game and use that leverage to get the win. Besides that, crushing defeats tend to be predictable and boring, and I must say the same about Rousey’s bouts. Alas, she just doesn’t have the division to complement her talent and hard work.
Chris Weidman versus Lyoto Machida: After his two curious victories over Anderson Silva, the question was: “Could Weidman slay a dragon?” As a diehard Machida fan, I was very much looking forward to this bout. In my mind, Weidman had unquestionably beaten Silva in their previous two bouts, but the second match had a definite asterisk to the victory. It certainly wasn’t a fluke. Weidman had spoken before the bout about how he had trained to counter the kicks which Silva had some success with on their first encounter, and a fighter can fracture an opponent’s leg by properly checking a hard kick, which is one reason why checking kicks isn’t simply a means of defending a kick, but of disabling that weapon. Though not a fluke, it certainly was a bit disappointing, and with Weidman having only eleven professional bouts up to that point, I wanted to see Silva give Weidman some adversity.
That never happened, and so I was looking forward to see Machida give Weidman another test. Was I hoping that Machida would win? Of course. Did I think he would? Nope. Weidman had prove himself to be an amazing fighter up to this point, capable of taking on any challenge before him, and he had what Gegard Mousasi didn’t have against Machida: Top-level wrestling. Top-level wrestling can change the parameters of any fight, and, given that Machida is such a good karateka, keeping the fight standing can be a recipe for disaster. So while I would have liked to see Machida defeat Weidman, the reality was that Weidman had the best likelihood of leaving the cage as the champion.
The two didn’t disappoint me whatsoever. Though Weidman was able to use pressure and grappling in order to disable Machida’s style, Machida was still dangerous throughout the fight, and Machida was able to test Weidman like no one else previously. Though a 4-1 bout, it was competitive throughout, and left me fully satisfied with both fighters. For all those pointing to an enlightening analysis of the bout, I’ll point you to Jack Slack’s “How Weidman Solved the Machida Riddle.”
At the end of the night, we can all rest assured knowing that the championship belt belongs to a man who can bring honor to it. Though Weidman won’t be able to please all of his critics, there will always be those who would prefer Anderson Silva in his place. Plus, after that performance, Machida is on the short-list for injury replacement fighters for another chance against Weidman. Moreover, if Machida wins his next couple of fights and if Weidman dominates his next couple of fighters, Weidman versus Machida II could very be in the future.